This litigation blog has been created on a "good faith basis" under penalties of perjury, to oppose any decisions or blogs created by the defendants/respondents and the courts in an attempt by plaintiff/petitioner to expose the blatant biases and prejudices of the political connections and corruption that plague a fair system of justice in the Judicial Branch of Government.
The political connections and corruption continue to protect the defendants/respondents' "Organized Crime Syndicate" because of their billionaire status and the fact that two of these defendants/respondents are NBC and Twentieth Century Fox our news media.
The defendants/respondents throughout this case have brazenly ridiculed due process and our constitution by perpetrating and committing numerous crimes, frauds, perjuries throughout these federal court proceedings knowing that they would not be prosecuted in any form or manner. This premeditated scheme included political connections and corruption in the Library of Congress and the court system.
These "political connections and corruption" plague our fair system of justice and promote lawlessness that creates the kind of biases and prejudices that destroy not only a fair system of justice but our entire Judicial System.
This plaintiff/petitioner was denied discovery even though a 79 page comparison sheet proved beyond any reasonable doubt that all of the characters, scenes and settings were extracted from this plaintiff/petitioner federal protected copyrights that were in fact "STOLEN" !
Discovery is a tool in the legal system that helps seek the truth but without Discovery no depositions, no interrogatories or pleadings are allowed.
In essence this billion dollar "Organized Crime Syndicate is protected from exposure that includes civil and criminal prosecution by outrageous decisions that undermine our entire legal system!
This creates the type of bias and prejudices that violates due process and our constitution, a person's right to a "Fair and Impartial Proceeding".
The defendants/respondents have intentionally tampered with federal evidence in this case by having employees to wit: Tracie Coleman and Richard D. Sharp employed at the "Library of Congress's" Copyright office whom have both intentionally perjured affidavits and tampered with federal evidence in these court proceedings.
Any blog or decision in relation to these cases against this plaintiff/petitioner should be taken with a "grain of salt" because the facts in these cases speak for themselves.
This plaintiff/petitioner created a "79" page chart of "similarities" in Characters, Scenes and Settings that clearly demonstrate and prove "Verbatim Copying", " Plagiarism" in essence considering the premeditated theft "Criminal Copyright Infringement"! These cases could be proven beyond any reasonable doubt a burden of proof greater then a mere preponderance of evidence needed for copyright infringement.
See: chivalryfilmproducions.com Characters, Scenes and Settings.
Meet the Parents, Meet the Fockers, Wedding Crashers and other movies in the industry are derived from "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" owned and originally created by Joseph Ardito.
The "Written Copyrights" owned and originally created by Joseph Ardito and filed at the Library Of Congress are as follows: May 15th, 1996 (TXu-74-462), December 24th, 1996 (TXu-775-750), April 27th, 1998 (PAu-2-283-460), February 2nd, 1999 (PAu-2-380-629, July 15th, 1999 (PAu-2-423-720).
Los Angeles Police Department Complaint filed on August 21st, 1998 Complaint No - 98062165 (Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials).
This case has been to the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.
The defendants in this case have made over $4,000,000,000.00 (Four Billion Dollars) from the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" that were originally created and owned by Joseph Ardito. The defendants in this case have used the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" as a blueprint in the making of "Meet the Parents", "Meet the Fockers", "Wedding Crashers" and other movies in the industry as the defendants-respondents try and pass these projects off as their own original creation. The writers and screenwriters are "Frauds" that have unlawfully copied and plagiarized from these "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Tenant" and/or "The Dysfunctionals" originally created and owned by Joseph Ardito.
"Public Awareness" Discovery a constitutional right in litigation has been barred by the courts even though the defendants in this case have tampered with federal evidence concerning the alleged 1991 videocassette that has paved the way to Summary Judgment. However, the Overwhelming Characters, Scenes and Settings alone are enough to prove "Criminal Copyright Infringement" due to the unlawful copying and plagiarism by the alleged screenwriters and authors that are "Frauds" who have unlawfully copied and plagiarized from "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Tenant" and/or "The Dysfunctionals" falsely claiming an original creation of "Meet the Parents", "Meet the Fockers", "Wedding Crashers" and other movies in the industry that were unlawfully copied and plagiarized from "Federal Protected Copyrighted Materials" that were stolen by the defendants-respondents from the originally creator Joseph Ardito.
However, due to the amount of monetary damages in this case the political connections, corruption and "greed" have persuaded justice to turn a blind eye in this case.
The defendants in this case have relied on Racketeering, Theft, Frauds, Plagiarism, Copying, Criminal Conduct, Discrimination, Tampering of Federal Evidence and corruption as defenses in this case. The political connections and corruption have taken this country back 150 years in where discrimination knew no boundaries.
The true perpetrators and discriminators of the industry will surface as they expose themselves in defending the "Organized Crime Syndicates' " involvement of the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" due to direct or indirect involvement relating to the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials."
A tacit approval or the condoning of the defendants criminal conduct in this case will only undermine the public's perception of justice. The tampering of federal evidence in this case is a felony, the transportation of stolen federal goods interstate and international are felonies, wire fraud and mail fraud are felonies, etc., etc. The defendants-respondents in this case have committed so many felonies that they are immune from federal prosecution in this case.
The alleged distorted 1991 Meet the Parents videocassette found in a black box at the Library of Congress even planting this distorted videocassette at the Library of Congress serves "no purpose" in this case with the exception of trying to deceptively mask, subterfuge and conceal the use of the overwhelming "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" that have been copied and plagiarized by the defendants-respondents in this case.
The perjured affidavits and testimonials given by employees, employed at the Library of Congress have with intent and premeditation falsified and altered evidence in this case concerning the alleged 1991 MTP distorted videocassette clearly demonstrating and concluding that this evidence is not credible because of voice over, alterations and distortions. The defendants-respondents have deceptively acted with intent and premeditation even throughout the "court proceedings" with respect to this evidence that had been used in barring discovery in a blatant attempt to mask, subterfuge and conceal unlawful use of the "Federal Protected Copyrighted Materials" originally created by Joseph Ardito that have been stolen by the defendants-respondents and unlawfully copied and plagiarized. However, the defendants-respondents' "Organized Crime Syndicate" believe they are above the law because they are protected by political connections, crimes, frauds and corruption a total manipulation and distortion of the law and our Judicial Branch of Government.
The Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials
My copyrights that were "stolen" by the defendants/respondents were not only "similar" through a 79 page comparison sheet that incorporates all of the stolen characters, stolen scenes and stolen settings in essence a product of "Verbatim Copying and Plagiarism"!
This could be proven "beyond any reasonable doublt" at a trial before a "Public Forum" through the "MEDIA" so the defendants/respondents "will not be able" to rely on the Corrupt political connections and corruptioin that is destroying our fair system of justice.
The Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials entitled, "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" were used in the making of defendants' projects entitled, "Meet the Parents 2000" and "Meet the Fockers 2004."
"The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" is NOT a Horror Movie. It is a multi-faceted comical satire ridiculing dysfunctional families; house scenes that take place between a landlord and a tenant any reference to a Horror Movie is inaccurate and absurd.
Plaintiffs' Characters and Scenes from "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" that are similar to "Meet the Parents 2000" Characters and Scenes.
CharactersandScenes extracted from the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" owned and originally created by Joseph Ardito and unlawfully used by the defendants in the making of "Meet the Parents" 2000 consist of the following:
CIA Agent Character, Nurse Character, Michael Angelo of Carpentry Character, Mother Character, Father Character, Pam Character, Brother-in-Law Character, The Animal Shelter Agent, Concerned Neighbor etc.,etc.
Jo Jo practicing in the mirror (stuttering) - Pam wi wi will you go out with me, High School Scene similar to Focker practicing "Pam will you marry me. Meeting the landlord similar Meeting the Parents. The landlord (cynical and apprehensively) is peeking through the blind as the tenant pulls into the drive way scene similar to Jack Brynes (cynical and apprehensively) is peeking through the window as Focker pulls into the driveway scene. Landlord what kind of car do you drive standard or automatic? similar to Jack Brynes what kind of car or did you pick the color scene. The landlord claims he was in the shower however his hair was dry scene similar to Gregg claiming that he was in the shower and his hair was dry scene. Landlord's rules and regulations of the house it my way or the shelter similar to Jack Brynes rules and regulations of the house it's my way or the highway. Landlord ridicules the tenant on his driving skills scene similar to Gregg being ridiculed on his driving skills. Tenant undergoes a Lie Detector Test similar to Gregg undergoing a lie detector test, Tenant is traumatized by the lie detector test similar to Gregg being traumatized by the lie detector test, Infrared Hidden Surveillance Camera similar to Jack Brynes hidden Surveillance Camera, Landlord I'm watching You Scenes similar to Jack Brynes I'm watching you scenes. Landlord stalking scenes similar to Jack Brynes stalking scenes. Allegiance the dysfunctionals had toward one another scene similar to Jack Brynes "Circle of Trust" scenes. The viewing the content of the video tape from the hidden infrared Surveillance Camera that concludes that the landlord was guilty by the recorded evidence similar to Jack Brynes viewing the video recorded evidence proving that Gregg was guilty by the recorded evidence. Volleyball Game Scene - in where a woman breaks her nose similar to Volleyball game scene in where Pam's sister sustains injury. Skimpy Bathing Suit Scene similar to Gregg's skimpy bathing suit scene, Gay ridicule scenes similar to Gay Ridicule scenes, Full luggage bag scene similar to full luggage bag scene, Jimmying open scene the door scenes similar to Jack Brynes jimmying open the bag scene, Ransacking the drawers scene similar to Pam's brother claiming that Gregg was going through his drawers, Content of lost luggage scene as sex paraphernalia Scene (pornographic). Flicking the badge Scene CIA character similar to Jack Brynes flicking the badge scene CIA, Race home scene as to where the cars pull up parallel exactly (3) times making eye contact similar to Jack Brynes racing Focker in where the car pulls up exactly 3 times parallel making eye contact, Eavesdropping scenes on the phone similar to Gregg eavesdropping scenes on the phone, Asian dialect scene similar to Jack Brynes Asian dialect scene, Southern dialect scene similar Jack Brynes telling travel agent to use a southern dialect scene, Landlord dresses up in a Nurses uniform scene for a nurse character similar Gregg Focker playing a male nurse and being ridiculed scene, Cheap bottle of champagne scene similar to Gregg purchasing a cheap bottle of champagne scene. The call from the concerned neighbor scene about his neighbors dog similar to Jack Brynes receiving a phone message from a concerned neighbor about his cat. The ASPCA scene similar to animal shelter scene, The house looked like a hurricane disaster scene in where the clothes were actually shredded in a bizarre manner and the dog is found in the closet scene similar Jack Brynes returning home from the restaurant entering his house as if a hurricane hit it with the shredded clothes everywhere. The Michael Angelo of carpentry scene including the cabinets (wood) from Vienna scene similar to Pam's ex-boyfriend whose hobby is carpentry ordering wood from Bolivia, The eviction scene of the tenant takes place after finding the shredded clothes similar to Gregg's eviction from the premises following the shredded clothes scene. The Airport Scene which leads to arrest similar to Gregg's airport scene which also leads to his arrest. The tenant's interrogation scene takes place while he is restrained and handcuffed in a chair similar to Gregg's interrogation scene while he is restrained and handcuffed to a chair scene. The Arrest Scene - in where the alleged perpetrator was carried off by police by restraining both his arms and legs, while acting and moving like a raving lunatic scene similar to Gregg being carried off the plane by police by restraining his arms and legs, while acting like a raving lunatic. Landlord always time conscience thinking he's going to be late (tardy phobia) similar Jack Brynes always time conscience thinking he's going to be late (tardy phobia). Father's bestiality joke similar to Jack Brynes bestiality joke scene. Father in relation to son-in-law this guy has been giving us problems since he came into the house scene similar Jack Brynes saying this guy has been giving us problems since he came into the house scene. The engagement ring at the airport similar to Focker looking at the engagement ring scene at the airport. The jack knifing of the car in front of a no parking zone scene similar to Jack Brynes jack knifing in front of a no parking zone scene. Driving erratically scene similar to Jack Brynes and Focker driving erratically scenes, Lying Scenes similar to Fockers lying scenes. Climbing up on the roof scene in where a neighbor is being pursued and vanishes in thin air like a cat similar to Gregg climbing out onto the roof pursuing Jinx who vanishes into thin air and is a cat scene, The frayed wire and spark scene similar to the frayed wired and spark scene, The karate scenes are similar to Gregg's karate scenes and many more scenes.
None of the above scenesare incorporated in defendants distorted backdated 1991 Meet the Parents video-cassetteversion with "no written copyright" that without a doubt has to be"FORENSICALLY EVALUATED".
The Characters and Scenes extracted from the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" originally created and owned by Joseph Ardito that were unlawfully used in the making of the defendants' project entitled "Meet the Fockers" 2004 consist of the following: Characters:
The CIA Character, Attorney Character, The Psychiatrist Character, The Police Character, The Theologian/Minister Character/Carpenter Character, Senior Citizen Characters, Hospital Staff Characters, The In-Law Characters, The Relative Characters, The Bureau of Child Welfare Agent, The Court Officer Character, The Dog Character, The Judge Character.
A baby being born scene at the hospital - The parents feel apprehensive about the doctors medical qualification due to his mal practice, however, the delivery goes well scene similar Gregg delivering a baby at the hospital lacking the medical qualifications as a doctor as the parents feel apprehensive, however the delivery goes well scene. Captain/Skipper scene in charge similar to Jack Brynes Captain/ Skipper scene in charge, The karate scene similar to the karate scene, The renovation scene of the bathroom at the landlords house similar to the renovation scene of the bathroom at the Focker house, The Dysfunctional v. Rational Method Scene in bringing up children scene similar to the Ferber v. Focker method in bringing up children scene. Landlord Lazar - Stun gun Scene talking about voltage while administering to the tenant similar to Lazer stun gun scene talking about voltage while administering to Focker, The police chase for speeding scene (stay in car) runs up to police similar to the police chasing the Fockers for speeding (stay in car) runs up to the police, The Exhibitionist (screaming in ecstasy) scene similar to the Focker exhibition of sex screaming in ecstasy while the Brynes are privy, Time conscience scene similar to Jack Brynes time conscience scene, The Theologian/Monk Scene similar to Pam's ex-boyfriend Rabbi/Minister scene, Sylvester Impersonation Scene similar to Focker's father Sylvester impersonation scene, Football huddle scene intercepted and tackled similar to Focker football huddle scene whereas Jack Brynes is intercepted and tackled scene. Indian Dance Scene similar to Focker's Indian dance scene. Truth Serum Scene - in where true feeling emerge similar Jack Brynes administering truth serum in where true feeling emerge, Most importantly F-cker is prevalent throughout plaintiff's script referring to individuals in a comical aspect similar to Focker meaning one in the same in a comical aspect. Little Fockers referring to children in a comical aspect similar Maid in Focker claiming the child is a cute littler f-cker, Talk of first time sex and details at the table similar to talk of first time sex and details in the Focker house, The "prosthetic dolls" in which landlord believes feels real similar to Jack Brynes believes the rubber booby feels real scene. Pornography video scenes similar to pornographic videos found in the Focker car. Sign Language Scene mimicking hands and mouth gestures in a perverted manner similar to Jack Brynes grandson - sign language mimicking hands and mouth in a perverted manner scene. Police upon a thorough investigation conclude that the allege victim was a perpetrator and sexual deviant similar to police upon a thorough investigation conclude that the allege defendants are sexual deviants. The flicking of the badge scene explaining that he would have the Police officer walking the beat in the circus for the next ten years similar to Jack Brynes flicking his badge and explaining to the police officer that he would be working in a retirement home for the next years. Painted Face Scene similar to Bernie Focker painting his face, Children referred to Little F-ckers in a comical aspect scene similar to house keeper making inference to Jack Brynes grandson as a little fucker in a comical aspect, The incarceration scene similar to incarceration scene in Meet the Fockers, The Judge Connection Scene with the nephew scene similar to Bernie Focker having a judge connection. The truth serum scene in where true feeling emerge that lead up to an embarrassing moment similar to Fockers truth serum scene which lead to an embarrassing moment. The pass out cold scene where he hits the floor similar to Focker out passes out drunk and hits the floor , The psychiatrist in her evaluation concludes that with guidance even the most stubborn could break the bonds of dysfunctionalism scene similar Roz claiming that Jack is stubborn and is crying out for a hug delving into the foundation of his dysfunctional problem, The Scene in where all families are dysfunctional in their own quirky ways similar to Bernie Focker mentioning in the RV that everyone has their issues. Square dance similar Do si do, The landlord spitting on the floor while talking similar to Rusty spitting on the floor while talking to Gregg, Judge connection scene in where the attorney representing the defendants is the Judges nephew similar Judge connection in where Bernie Focker's wife has a connection with the Judge, and many more Scenes.
NONE OF THESE SCENES ABOVE ARE INCORPORATED IN THE DISTORTED MEET THE PARENTS 1991 VHS VIDEO-CASSETTE THAT HAS TO BE FORENSICALLY EVALUATED.
******* THE 1991 MEET THE PARENTS VIDEOCASSETTE OFFERED INTO EVIDENCE BY THE DEFENDANTS' IN THIS CASE HAD BEEN TAMPERED WITH BY AND THROUGH EMPLOYEES AT THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. THIS SAME TAMPERED EVIDENCE WAS ATTACHED AS AN EXHIBIT TO DEFENDANTS' SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION.
******* THIS NEW EVIDENCE PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT WILL CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE THAT THE DEFENDANTS HAVE CONTINUED TO ACT CRIMINALLY THROUGHOUT THESE COURT PROCEEDINGS PERPETRATING FRAUDS ON THE COURT AS WELL AS THIS APPELLANT. ANY REFERENCE TO DEFENDANTS' 1991 MEET THE PARENTS VIDEOCASSETTE FOUND IN A BLACK BOX AT THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS THAT ALLEGEDLY HAD "NO LABELS ATTACHED" HAS BEEN COMPROMISED. THE CHAIN OF EVIDENCE IN THESE PROCEEDINGS CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE CORRUPTION ON IT'S HIGHEST LEVEL.
THE INTENTIONAL TAMPERING OF FEDERAL EVIDENCE PROVES THAT THE DEFENDANTS IN THIS CASE CONTINUE TO CONDUCT THEMSELVES IN A CRIMINAL MANNER.
The employees at the Library of Congress to wit: Tracie Coleman and Richard D. Sharp certified documentation under oath stating that the 1991 MTP videocassette found in a black box at the Library of Congress had "no labels attached." However, upon an independent investigation and inspection of the alleged 1991 MTP videocassette at the Library of Congress ---- revealed that labels were "attached" the 60 minutes video label had been manually crossed out and altered to reflect 72 minutes of video which is equivalent to 12 pages of added script.... This evidence if not tampered would have paved the way to discovery however the defendants used the 2 certifications by the employees under oath as exhibits and the defendants' deceptively placed a new label over the minutes with the caption of the case confirming the perjured statements under oath by Tracie Coleman and Richard D. Sharp. At this point it is fair to say that the 1991 Meet the Parents is not credible and may had been planted by the defendants for the purpose of these proceedings to mask and subterfuge that the defendants' in this case have used the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" originally created by Joseph Ardito.
The OVERWHELMING : Characters, Scenes and Settings used from the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" originally created by Joseph Ardito are "INDISPUTABLE."
"Meet the Parents" and "Meet the Fockers" are a product of Plaintiff's "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled, "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" this is indisputable.
The defendants in this case rely on "The Indisputable Documentary Evidence," of the 1991 ? "Meet the Parents" VHS video-cassette with "no written copyright." This VHS video-cassette was allegedly found in a black box at the Library of Congress with allegedly no markings and allegedly preceded this Plaintiff's copyright by ? years. However, this story is a "Horror Flick" with a twist!
This evidence has been compromised altered and tampered with at the Library of Congress. It is fair to say that this evidence has been planted by the defendants.
The 1991 distorted "Meet The Parents" video-cassette is narrated by a gas station attendant, the father is a retired gas station owner. The family is portrayed as an ordinary family until the end. A stick is thrown into a lake for the dog to fetch; the dog drowns. The one daughter commits suicide and is found swinging from a rope in her bedroom. The father comes down the steps on a shot gun spree accidentally killing his surviving daughter and wife. Shortly thereafter, the father supposedly dies of a heart attack. This film has all the makings of a horror movie because, everyone in the family including the dog dies a tragic death !
This horrific sequel could not fit squarely into "Meet the Fockers" because everyone in the family including the dog is dead.
Sorry, did I say "This blockbuster of a Horror Flick had a sequel!
Who actually saw Meet the Parents in 1991 ?
The alleged sequel was incorporated in this distorted 1991 Meet the Parents video-cassette with "no written copyright" that was found in a black box at the Library Of Congress. The stories alleged sequel is narrated by a gas station attendant as a male customer walks up to the counter claiming to the gas station attendant that he is taking his children to the circus. The gas station attendant replies! What you are taking your children to the circus? Stop and go back! As he is about to elaborate on another horrific story and chain of events in where the entire family will most likely resemble the same horrific ending in where "Everyone in the family will die including a dog if they have one." Any reference to this movie as a comedy is inaccurate. This was in fact the alleged sequel incorporated in the distorted MTP 1991 video-cassette that has to be forensically evaluated.
The distorted MTP 1991 (?) VHS - Has "No Written Copyright" just the fact that it came in a black box with no labels.
See: Jay Roach's in his Meet the Focker's commentaries who was in fact a Producer and the Director of both"Meet the Parents" and "Meet the Fockers." Jay Roach stated unequivocally we had a "great script" with layer upon layer (multi-faceted) in which many movies could be made and many movies were in fact made from the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" originally created and owned by Joseph Ardito. These "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" had started a trend in comedy and was used as a blueprint in numerous movies made by these defendants.
MEET THE PARENTS 1991 (?) VHS VERSION: Has Noneof the following Scenes or Characters:
None of the Characters:
No CIA Character, No Nurse Character, No Attorney Character, No Psychiatrist Character, No In-Laws Characters- cousins, Uncles, Aunts, Characters, No Police Officer Character, No Doctor Characters, No Animal Shelter Character, No Senior Citizens, No Judge Connection, No Investigative Characters, No Bureau Child Welfare Agent, No Animal Shelter Agent, No Concerned Neighbor Character, No Doctors, etc., etc.
None of the Scenes:
No I'm Watching You Scenes, No Lie Detector Test Scene, No Infrared Hidden Surveillance Camera Scenes, No Stun Gun Scene, No allegiance scenes = circle of trust, No Truth Serum Scene, No Scene where true feelings emerge from the truth serum Scene, No drunk pass out Scene, No Rules and Regulation Scenes, No peeking through the blinds with a cynical attitude scene as the car pulls into the driveway, No questioning the car Scene, No erratic driving Scene, No race home Scene, No shredded clothes Scene, No eviction scene, No airport Scene, No psychiatrist scenes or psychological evaluations scenes, No inside the aircraft Scene, No Interrogation Scene, No Investigative Scene, No lock up or incarceration Scene, No Prosthetic doll Scene or Mammary Gland Scene, No cop Scene, No Carpentry Scene, No Renovation Scene, No Cheap Bottle of Champagne Scene, No Karate Scenes, No first time talk of Sex Scene, No Dysfunctional or Rational method in bringing up Children Scene, No lock up Scenes or being carried off like a Raving Lunatic by Police while kicking arms and legs Scene, No being Restrained Scene, No Frayed Wire Scene, No Climbing up on the Roof Scene "taking off like a scared cat Scene, No Asian dialect Scene, No Southern Accent Scene or any type of accent Scene, No eviction Scene of shredded clothes, No painted face Scene, No referring to characters as f cker in a comical aspect, No little F cker referring to the child in a comical aspect Scene, No airport Scene, No Hidden Surveillance Camera Scene, No being viewed by the Hidden Surveillance Camera Scene, No Eavesdropping Scene, No listening on a Phone Extension Scene, No Michael Angelo of Carpentry Scene, No Elmer Fudd Impersonation Scene, No Sylvester Impersonation Scene, No Reference to the President Bill Clinton Scene, No Gay Ridicule Scenes, No Reference to the General Scene, No reference to possible Coup d'etat Scene these Scenes go hand in hand with the CIA Character, No CIA Character Scene, No Children Scene, No Senior Citizen Scene, No Sign Language Scene, No mimicking hand and mouth gesture Scene, No Red light District Scene, No Ridiculing Driving Scene, No In-Laws Scene, No Volleyball Scene in where a woman sustains injury to her Nose Scene, No Skimpy Bathing Suit Scene, No hospital Scene where a baby is being born and the parents are cynical and apprehensive about the qualification of the staff member delivering the baby Scene, No Square Dance Scene, No Tazer Gun Scene, No psychiatric evaluation Scenes, No talk about volts in relation to the tazer gun, stun gun when administering the voltage, No man fleeing from custody with a tranquilizer gun scene, No scene in where a psychiatrist tries to evaluate the problem, No scene in where the bonds of dysfunctionalism are broken, and many more scenes that only prove beyond any reasonable doubt that Meet the Parents and Meet the Fockers are a product of plaintiffs "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant."
Furthermore, "Absolutely" no sequel from this distorted 1991 Meet the Parents video-cassette could possibly fit squarely into "Meet the Fockers".
On the other hand, Plaintiff's "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled, "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" Incorporate all these scenes and more. The "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" didn't need a sequel because the sequel was already incorporated into the original creation. The Tenant and/or The Dysfunctionals would resume the sequel by "Meeting Another Dysfunctional Family."
Whereas, the sequel for the alleged distorted 1991 (?) Meet the Parents video-cassette entails a totally different family - a father taking his children to the circus where they will all be massacred.
It is fair to say that whatever portions of the Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials the defendants didn't unlawfully use in "Meet the Parents" they unlawfully used in Meet The Fockers " and so forth in other movies.
Meet the Parents" and "Meet the Fockers" are undoubtedly a product of Plaintiff's "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" originally created and owned by Joseph Ardito.
Again, in further proving Plaintiff's position, the Plaintiff's sequel for "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" was already incorporated in Plaintiff's 1996-1998 "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials." The sequel's story for "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" was for the Tenant to "Meet Another Dysfunctional Family" which squarely fits into "Meet the Fockers", a 2004? copyright! - unlawfully stolen by the defendants-respondents and unlawfully used. "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant" fit sequel fits so perfectly ? Because it's the Plaintiff's original creation! Whatever "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" the defendants-respondents didn't use in "Meet the Parents, they used in "Meet the Fockers, Wedding Crashers and other movies !!!!!!
The sole use of Gregg Glienna and Mary Ruth Clarke's VHS distorted video-cassette of 1991(?) "Meet the Parents" was to deceptively mask, conceal and subterfuge that the defendants acted in concert with premeditation and intent and knew at all times that they were unlawfully using plaintiff's "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" owned and originally created by Joseph Ardito and unlawfully used these "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials in the making of defendants-respondents' projects entitled "Meet the Parents", "Meet the Fockers", "Wedding Crashers" and "other movies" in the industry.
It is abundantly clear in this case that the defendants-respondents have unlawfully pawned off the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" off as their own original creation.
This criminal conduct is outrageous and will only undermine the publics' perception of justice in relation to these defendants-respondents that have acted with unconscionable with premeditation, malice and ill-will. These defendants-respondents' have a moral obligation not only to this plaintiff, but to the public at large. The defendants' sophisticated "Organized Crime Syndicate" in this case believe that they are above the law due to political connections, corruption and the fact that they own and used the media in a distorted manner to subterfuge their criminal conduct.
The decisions in this case are being appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States.
The plaintiff's case deals with "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" however, this plaintiff was precluded from "discovery" by the court. Discovery is a constitutional right and was a crucial factor in this case because "discovery" would have revealed the "Organized Crime Syndicate" involved in the "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials." entitled "The Dysfunctionals and/or The Tenant"
Any impartial jury in the world or in any foreign court would conclude that "Meet the Parents" and "Meet the Fockers" are undoubtedly the product of plaintiff's "Stolen Federal Copyrighted Materials" entitled "The Dysfunctionals and or The Tenant."
Justice should be Impartial and Fair to all Litigants because it will only reflect on the Judicial Branch of Government and undermine the public's perception of Justice.
The Wedding Crashers This Plaintiff is cognizant of the fact that litigation concerning The Wedding Crashers has already been petitioned in the California Courts. An investigation concerning this lawsuit is now being conducted. This Plaintiff's scripts were stolen, as well as various project outlines, entitled "The Attorneys" - The outline encompasses the following scenes: The Attorneys Actually Crashed Wedding Scene, The Sympathy Routine Scene, The Hog Tied Scene, The Gay Scene, The Boat Scene, The Closet Queer Scene, The Football Scene, The Man Punched in the Stomach and Doubles up on the Floor Scene, The Virgin Scene, The Wink of Accomplishment Scene, The Fake Tears in Attempt to Entice the Woman Scene, Drinking from the Pitcher Scene, Eating Like Animals Scene - where you can actually see the food tumbling in their mouths while talking and spitting food all over the floor, The Painter Scene, Man in Closet Scene, The Minister Scene, Changing Names Scene - where they fabricate stories and occupations as to where they become unrecognizable and make it difficult to track them down, Cognito Scene, Nunchuks Scene, Ma Make the Meatballs Scene, The 4 Day Weekend Excursion Trip that Would Turn out to be a Weekend in Ecstasy Scene, The Kind Man Scene, The Laxative Put Into a Drink Scene, The Dysfunctional Family Scene and many more Scenes.
Meet the Parents, Meet the Fockers, Wedding Crashers and other movies in the industry are a product of "Stolen Federal Copyright Materials" originally created and owned by Joseph Ardito and were in fact stolen by the defendants/respondents "Organized Crime Syndicate" in a premeditated criminal scheme depriving this plaintiff/appellant of his federal protected copyrights.
The federal court justices in these cases barred "discovery" a crucial factor in these cases that would have exposed Hollywood's Organized Crime Synidcate .
The predated 1991 Meet the Parents videocassette was a manufactured "fraud", used as a title and nothing more.
All of the characters, scenes & settings used in Meet the Parents, Meet the Fockers & Wedding Crashers were in fact "unlawfully extracted" from this plaintiff/appellant's 5 federal protected copyrights "stolen" by Hollywood's Organized Crime Syndicate .
The 1991 MTP videocassette found in a "black box with no title" was in fact a manufactured fraud used by Pryor, Cashman, Sherman & Flynn as a legal menuever in a fraudulent attempt of protecting "Hollywood's Organized Crime Syndicate" in evading a Civil R.I.C.O. proceeding.
Tracie Coleman & Richard D. Sharp both employees at the Library of Congress acted with intent and premeditation in perjurying their affidavits in an attempt of validating the 1991 MTP videocassett a fraudulent copyright to protect Hollywood's Organized Crime Syndicate.
Tracy Coleman & Richard D. Sharp both employees at the Library of Congress acted in concert and collusion by tampering with federal protected copyrights & federal evidence in a blatant attempt of validating a pre-existing manufactured fraudulent 1991 MTP videocassette beingused as to establish this criminal legal menuever in protecting Hollywood's Organized Crime Syndicate.
Tracy Coleman & Richard D. Sharp both employed at the Library of Congress were duly responsible for the copying of all the evidence on these copyright cases thate were being transfered to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
The plaintiff/appellant's 5 federal protected copyrights were in fact tampered by these criminals as over "35 pages" were missing from these federal protected copyrights.
The corrupted decisions by Clinton's federal court appointed justices relied on manufactured frauds, sabotage, perjured affidavits,perjured contracts and a theft ring that has infiltrated the Library of Congress,F.B.I., LAPD, United States Attorney General's Office, Judicial Branch of Government and other government agencies.
However, all of the characters, scenes and settings unlawfully used in Meet the Parents, Meet the Fockers & Wedding Crashers were in fact "extracted" from this plaintiff/appellant's 5 federal protected copyrights and this can be proven beyond any reasonable doubt.
The sabotaging of the complaint by attorneys from this plaintiff/petitioner's same law office who in fact participated in the theft of this plaintiff/petitioner's stolen federal copyrights knew at all times that all of the characters, scenes and settings used in Meet the Parents, Meet the Fockers and Wedding Crashers were in fact extracted from this plaintiff/appellant"s 5 federal protected copyrights that were stolen.
The defense attorneys as well as the Clintons appointed federal court justices, employees at the Library of Congress had all acted in concert and collusion as they knew at all times that the copyright infringement cases would have been proven beyond any reasonable doubt, a more stringent burden of proof needed in the civil proceeding leading to a Criminal R.I.C.O. conviction awarding this plaintiff/appellant treble damages.
The Clinton appointed federal court justices in these cases basically relied on fraud , tampered federal evidence, selective bits and pieces of copyrighted materials extracted by career corrupted justices to coincide with the unorthodox, unlawful, criminal legal meneuver by the defense attorneys in assisting the corrupted federal court justices in the barring of discovery that violated due process & 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
The Clinton appointed federal court justices in a deliberate & bias opinion relied on "bits and pieces" of evidence that if taken in full would have proved criminal copyright infringement beyond any reasonable doubt , including and not limited to the frauds, perjured affidavits and felonies committed to secured a corrupted decision.
The federal court justices in these cases barred discovery even though a "79 page comparison sheet" formulated by this plaintiff/petitioner proved beyond any reasonable doubt that all of the characters, scenes and settings were unlawfully used by the defendants/respondents and were in fact extracted from this plaintiff/petitioner's copyrights that were "stolen and unlawfully" used in defendants/respondents movies.
Chivalry Film Productions, et al v. NBC Universal Inc, et al., 05-cv-5627 as a legal ruling will never change the fact that these decisions were in fact corrupted and manifested by crimes, frauds, felonies, political connections and corruption in our court system creating a total miscarriage of justice. These unlawful decisions through public exposure will eventually be reversed!
Any judge using these cases in an attempt of validating this decision or any other decision relating to these cases continues to create an "Abomination Of The Law". The alleged 1991 Meet the Parents predated videocassette copyright is a "fraud" and "not credible" used as a title and nothing more! It had been tampered and planted by the theft ring and was part of a premeditated scheme unlawfully used by the defendants attorneys with the intent of manipulating and distorting the decisions in these cases.
The Facts "Organized Crime Syndicate"
1. Gregg Glienna and Mary Ruth Clarke the alleged owners of the 1991 MTP Videocassette came into possession of this plaintiff/appellant's federal protected through a "Theft".
2. The alleged Producer "Sodenburg" is linked to the 1991 Meet the Parents videocassette. The defendants/respondents through a premeditated scheme had been in possession of this plaintiff/appellants federal protected copyrights and knew at all times that the copyrights were in fact "stolen".
Sodenburg and the defendants/respondents had through a premeditated scheme unlawfully used this plaintiff/appellants federal protected copyrights that were "Stolen" and devised a criminal scheme with its members of the "Organized Crime Syndicate" to pre-date a fraudulent 1991 MTP videocassette that was used as title and nothing more, in a blatant attempt of evading criminal liability, civil liability with the objective and intent of barring "discovery".
Discovery in this case was the linchpin and crucial factor that would have led to the prosecution, exposure and convictions of the members linked to the "Organized Crime Syndicate".
3. The defendants/respondents - NBC Universal Inc. et al, knew at all times that they were in possession of this plaintiff/petitioner's federal protected copyrights and have taken an active role and steps in participating in this criminal scheme of this "Organized Crime Syndicate" by preparing and producing fraudulent documents that were needed and offered into evidence in an attempt to validate the "fraudulent" 1991 MTP videocassette.
4. The defendants/respondents with intent and premeditation deliberately perpetrating numerous crimes , felonies & frauds in an attempt to validate a fraudulent copyright and sustain corrupted decisions by Clinton appointed federal justices with the intent of subterfuging their the stolen federal protected copyrights crimes they believed were corroborating by career corrupted Clinton appointed federal court justices that through violations of the law protected Hollywood's Organized Crime Syndicate that has evaded all civil and criminal liabilities by fraudulently relying on the manufacturing of fabricated evidence that would illegally bar "discovery" a crucial factor in the case that would deny due process and the 14 Amendment of the constitution.
5. Dr. Rico Semonini an employee at NBC Universal and an employee at the same law firm as plaintiff/petitioner came into possession of this plaintiff/appellant's federal protected copyrights through an interval of "thefts" without the consent or permission of this plaintiff/petitioner. A physical theft occurring at Dr. Rico Semonini's house on August 21st, 1998 was reported to the L.A.P.D.in Los Angeles. Police Report No. 980626165.
6. NBC Universal Inc. et al., the defendants/respondents were all in possession of this plaintiff/petitioner's federal protected copyrights through "thefts" without consent or permission.
7. John Hamburg the alleged writer of both Meet the Parents and Meet the Fockers attended undergrad with attorneys from this plaintiff/petitioner's same office. John Hamburg is a writer "fraud" along with the other writer frauds claiming authorship by copyright thefts!
These defendants/respondents and their writers are copyrights "THIEVES and "FRAUDS" that claimed authorship of federal protective copyrights that were "stolen" and unlawfully used without express permission or consent of this plaintiff/petitioner.
John Hamburg is linked and connected to the "Organized Crime Syndicate" as is Dr. Americo Semonini, Steven Sodenburg and other members of the defendants/respondents in these cases they are all linked to the theft and " Organized Crime Syndicate".
8. These defendants/respondents had known at all times that this plaintiff/petitioner's copyrights were "stolen" and through a premeditated scheme devised, in an unconscionable plan and manner to evade criminal and civil prosecution by perpetrating numerous crimes, felonies, frauds that led to the tampering of federal evidence, perjuring affidavits, attorneys involved in the theft actually help formulate the complaint with the intent of sabotage due to their own criminal involvement concerning the thefts, the planting and back dating of the alleged 1991 MTP fraud a pre-existed videocassette copyright. This was used as a title and nothing more!
These legal maneuvers were premeditated and intentionally devised in a blatant attempt to block "discovery" in the court, that would expose the political connections and the corrupted officials in our government that are destroying a fair and impartial justice system.
9. The complaint was formulated by this plaintiff/appellant with the assistance of attorneys from the "same law office" that with intent and premeditation have unethically sabotaged parts of the complaint due to there involvement in the "theft" and ties to the "Organized Crime Syndicate".
The judges in his decisions relied on bits and pieces of the complaint that these same attorneys sabotaged with the intent of manipulating and distorting the decisions. These attorneys are tied and connected to the Organized Crime Syndicate and were involved in the intervals of thefts of this plaintiff/appellants federal protected copyrights that were stolen.
10. The defendants/respondents in the summary judgment motion, did not oppose any opposition or affidavits concerning the "Theft of the Stolen Copyrights" relating to the transportation of stolen federal goods interstate and international, fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, and did not oppose the police report in essence the defendants/respondents did not "answer or oppose" anything concerning the "theft" of this plaintiff/appellants federal protected copyrights.
11. The 79 page comparison sheet formulated "after" the complaint clearly demonstrated and proved beyond a reasonable doubt that all of the characters, scenes and settings were stolen by defendants/respondents and used unlawfully clearly demonstrating and proving that the defendants/respondents were in fact guilty of the theft, "Verbatim Copying and Plagiarism". These facts are indisputable.
12. Discovery in this case was a "crucial factor" in exposing the "Organized Crime Syndicate" and its members, that have been protected by political connections, frauds, perjured affidavits, tampered federal evidence, and corruption in our court system.
These copyrights were "stolen" through intervals of time - January, 1997 , April 15th, 1998 and August 21st, 1998
In a nutshell the defendants/respondents' have through political connections, crimes, frauds, perjured affidavits, tampered federal evidence, sabotaging of the complaint by attorneys linked and tied to the "Organized Crime Syndicate", and the corruption in the court system that violates due process and our constitution!
The public should be aware that this case has set a precedent of illegal means in obtaining decisions. This not only violates a code of ethics in the legal system in this country but violates legal systems in other countries that are signatories to the "Berne Convention" a treaty designed to help enforce the laws of copyright infringements in the world.
In essence these manifested decisions rely on crimes, fraud, felonies, perjury, tampered federal evidence and corruption that is destroying due process and a "fair and impartial system of justice all over the world".
These defendants/respondents are : NBC, Twentieth Century Fox, Dreamworks, and other studios listed as defendants/respondents in the "litigation" label to the left on chivalryfilmproductions.com scroll to the bottom of the page and see the "caption to the complaint". These defendants/respondents have intentionally ridiculed and violated a "fair system of justice" through political connections, crimes, frauds and corruption because they believe they are above the law.
The District Court and United States Court of Appeals have violated due process, the 14th Amendment of the constitution and a "fair and impartial proceeding" by relying on crimes, fraud, felonies, perjured affidavits, tampered federal evidence and corruption in our court system as well as the Library of Congress and other federal agencies in the United States. These defendants/respondents are without conscience, ill willed and part of an "Organized Crime Syndicate" that has continually evaded prosecution and exposure all because of political connections and corruption in our court system that is destroying and plaguing a "fair system of justice". This has to be eradicated and abolished in the interest of justice.
Please!! Tell friends, co-workers and family members.. Spread the news to stop the "political connections, crimes, frauds and corruption" in our legal System that causes prejudice, bias, and the destruction of a fair system of justice in the United States.